Case Law in the United States

Understanding judge-made law and judicial precedent in the American legal system

What is Case Law?

Case law (also known as common law or judge-made law) is law established by judicial decisions rather than by statutes or regulations. It forms a key part of the U.S. legal system and many others. When judges decide cases, their interpretations become precedent for future similar cases, creating a body of law based on judicial decisions.

1

Judicial Opinions

Case law is created when judges write opinions (also called decisions) explaining the reasoning behind their rulings in court cases. These opinions interpret:

  • โ€ขConstitutional provisions
  • โ€ขStatutes
  • โ€ขAdministrative rules
  • โ€ขPrior case law (precedent)
2

Binding vs. Persuasive Authority

  • โ€ขBinding precedent: A legal decision from a higher court (in the same jurisdiction) that must be followed by lower courts.
  • โ€ขExample: U.S. Supreme Court decisions are binding on all federal and state courts.
  • โ€ขPersuasive precedent: Decisions from courts in other jurisdictions or lower courts that may influence but are not required to be followed.
3

Hierarchy of Courts

The authority of case law depends on where it comes from in the judicial hierarchy:

  • โ€ขU.S. Supreme Court: Highest authority on federal constitutional matters.
  • โ€ขFederal Courts of Appeals (e.g., 2nd Circuit, 9th Circuit): Binding within their circuit.
  • โ€ขDistrict Courts: Trial-level federal courts; decisions may carry weight but are not binding.
  • โ€ขState Supreme Courts: Final word on state law, unless it involves federal law or the U.S. Constitution.
4

Stare Decisis (Let the Decision Stand)

This principle holds that courts should follow precedent to ensure consistency and predictability in the law. It helps:

  • โ€ขMaintain legal stability
  • โ€ขGuide lower courts and future decisions
  • โ€ขPromote fairness by treating similar cases alike
5

Components of a Case Law Decision

A typical judicial opinion includes:

  • โ€ขFacts: The background of the case
  • โ€ขIssue: The legal question(s) the court must answer
  • โ€ขRule: The legal principle or law applied
  • โ€ขAnalysis: The court's reasoning
  • โ€ขConclusion: The court's final decision (e.g., affirm, reverse, remand)
6

How Case Law Evolves

Case law evolves as:

  • โ€ขCourts overturn or modify previous decisions
  • โ€ขNew interpretations of statutes or constitutional clauses emerge
  • โ€ขSocietal values and technologies change

Constitutional Protections in Case Law

The following legal sources establish protections for individuals during encounters with law enforcement:

โš–๏ธ

The U.S. Constitution

The Fourth Amendment protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures. This includes protections against unlawful stops or detentions by law enforcement.

The Fifth Amendment provides protections against self-incrimination, which comes into play when individuals are detained or questioned by the police.

The Sixth Amendment guarantees the right to a speedy trial, the right to counsel, and the right to confront witnesses, which becomes relevant if the detention leads to criminal charges.

๐Ÿ”Š

Miranda Rights (Miranda v. Arizona, 1966)

When a person is in custody and subject to interrogation, they must be informed of their rights to remain silent and to have an attorney present, as outlined by the Miranda warning.

๐Ÿ›๏ธ

State Laws

Every state may have additional statutes and case law that clarify and expand upon individual rights during police encounters. These laws may cover when and how police can stop, detain, or search an individual.

๐Ÿ“

Case Law

Various U.S. Supreme Court decisions and lower court rulings clarify the application of constitutional rights during stops, detentions, and arrests. Key cases include:

Terry v. Ohio (1968): Established the rules for "stop and frisk" encounters, where police may briefly detain individuals based on reasonable suspicion.

Florida v. Bostick (1991): Ruled that individuals are not necessarily "seized" during a bus stop if they feel free to leave.

Berghuis v. Thompkins (2010): Clarified that a waiver of Miranda rights does not require an affirmative statement.

๐Ÿ‘ฎ

Police Department Policies

Local police departments may have their own procedures that govern how they interact with individuals during stops and detentions. These policies often reflect both legal requirements and best practices in law enforcement.

๐Ÿ”

Civil Rights Laws

42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 allows individuals to file lawsuits if their constitutional rights are violated by state actors, including law enforcement.

These sources collectively govern how law enforcement officers must interact with individuals during stops, detentions, and arrests, ensuring that citizens' rights are protected.

Landmark Cases

These landmark Supreme Court decisions have fundamentally shaped American law and society:

Brown v. Board of Education (1954)

Ruled racial segregation in public schools unconstitutional

Supreme Court

Roe v. Wade (1973)

Established the right to abortion under the right to privacy

Supreme Court

Miranda v. Arizona (1966)

Established the requirement for police to inform suspects of their rights

Supreme Court

Obergefell v. Hodges (2015)

Guaranteed the right to same-sex marriage

Supreme Court

Learn More About Case Law